Collaborative and collective writing. Although these methods are different, they both reflect the spirit of shared storytelling. Imagine a page where authors fill their stories together, or a collection where individual stories harmonise within a single book. In this article, I would like to talk about the nature of collaborative and collective writing by briefly pointing out their positive and negative outcomes.
Photo by Claudio Schwarz on Unsplash
Collaborative writing is the creation of a unity in words. It is like a literary dance between authors, with each partner contributing to the choreography of a shared story. Think of the Strugatsky brothers (Arkadi and Boris), who together create immersive worlds; “Roadside Picnic” is an example, if you want to hop on. Another novel, “The Mote in God’s Eye” by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle, has one of the most interesting and detailed descriptions of alien life and its encounters with humanity I have ever read.
When authors collaborate, they create a seamless event, merging their ideas, characters and plots into a single narrative. Frankly, it must be harder than it sounds. But this approach allows for the fusion of different perspectives, resulting in a story that bears the fingerprints of multiple imaginations.
Positive Outcomes of Collaborative Writing
Different perspectives come together to infuse the story with a wealth of ideas. Whether it is their way of thinking, their culture, their personal thoughts on this story, they all season the story with different spices to make it tasty for the readers.
Although sometimes these collaborative works need a means of communication (back then, they had to write letters and this may have delayed the publication of many stories), the authors can work together and create a unified story with a consistent voice. That is why the Strugatski brothers were able to create so much and became efficient and renowned authors of the Soviet era. I suppose it was a bit easier for them because they were brothers, they could understand each other’s thoughts better to eliminate possible conflicts in the narrative.
Challenges of Collaborative Writing
Synchronising creative efforts requires effective communication and coordination. One side may find a great idea, while the other may find it useless or unrelated to the current plot or narrative of the story. This may even result in a demotivating approach for the denied writer. The lack of freedom could stifle imagination or the will to create more.
Maintaining a consistent tone and style can also be a challenge with multiple voices. Although they may be friends, understand each other’s thinking, or perhaps respect each other’s previous work, each writer has a way of expressing themselves, that may or may not be obvious. This can lead to an inconsistent narrative and a complex structure that can make it difficult for the reader to follow the story.
Photo by Jordan Arnold on Unsplash
At the other end of the literary spectrum is collective writing, which is like a reflection of each individual’s thoughts. Imagine a book in which each chapter is a unique contribution to a broader theme. It allows the authors to retain the autonomy and freedom (might be limited if the theme is certain) of their stories, each narrative standing as an independent and self-contained creation within the pages of a shared book. There are, of course, two sides to this coin too.
Positive Outcomes of Collective Writing
As we have said, individual freedom gives writers the freedom to express their unique styles, perspectives and ideas. No writer wants to be constrained by specific rules unless they know there is a limitation for a reason. Imagination can’t fit into a narrow mould, but can be reshaped within the desired categories that authors accepted in order to write.
Also, the beauty of this style is that it brings different perspectives to each story. Readers experience a variety of stories within a single collection. None of them intertwine or merge into one. Each of them has a unique taste, and perhaps even the genres of their stories can be different. They can write a dystopian tale of a futuristic society or a horrific one on its way to the apocalypse. The reader just has to be prepared to jump from one to the other.
Challenges of Collective Writing
Achieving a cohesive theme can be a challenge with different stories. Yes, we said that genres can be different, but sometimes it can be narrowed down depending on the main element of the stories. If not, different writers may write in different lengths and with different visions, which could diminish the importance of the background theme of all the stories. The focus may shift in different stories.
Of course, some authors may be more loved or popular than others. So you might expect the same kind of stories from the others. However, the quality of the individual stories can vary, which affects the overall reading experience. If you really want to read a collection, you have to understand that the quality will vary according to your taste. This does not mean that some are bad and the others are good, but they may not be for your appetite. Some authors may be writing in this genre/theme for the first time.
Each approach has its own benefits and challenges. Collaborative writing thrives on the synergy of voices, creating a unified narrative, while collective writing celebrates the autonomy of individual stories, painting a diverse picture within the same canvas. Choosing between the two is a matter of preference — whether you seek the harmonious blend of a unified work or the distinct melodies of independent voices.
Articles that might interest you:
Comments